American News Report

2 recommendations and reviews from 2 people

• Referral from December 27, 2013
  

  Freedom F. asked:

  Under this Title 21 USC Part B 811 (a); we can petition the Attorney General as a interested party petition under Title 21 USC Part B 811 (b), "to remove marihuana entirely from the schedule, and after gathering the necessary data, request from the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Kathleen Sebius) a scientific and medical evaluation and recommendations" Please spread and share this valuable information. Someone start the petition as a single person, not as a organization, as a interested party. Then once someone starts a petition spread and share it. We then can present the petition along with the petition of the interested party. Please someone correct any errors in this post if need be. I am not a lawyer but know we can use the words against them that they use against us.

  

  Dave D. replied:

  I said I would use 70's as a base because modern day science has shown tons of research compared to the early year's science of cannabis that the government required. So all those dates you mentioned meant nothing to the government and the Marijuana tax act was passed. The medical application of cannabis isn't the point here it is about prohibition and how it also effected medical marijuana. MMJ wasn't in question but MMJ laws were. ""The American Medical Association (AMA) opposed the act because the tax was imposed on physicians prescribing cannabis, retail pharmacists selling cannabis, and medical cannabis cultivation/manufacturing; instead of enacting the marijuana Tax Act, the AMA proposed cannabis be added to the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act." Marijuana tax act wasn't just created to impose on physicians but on all marijuana. AMA proposed it be added to the Harrison act but never was instead the Marijuana tax act passed which was created in the mold of the Harrison act. Beside the AMA are the ones who are keeping marijuana illegal in this country by telling the DOJ it has no medical uses. I guess William C. Woodward, MD would be removed from the AMA these days on his view points of cannabis. http://americannewsreport.com/nationalpainreport/ama-opposes-legalization-calls-marijuana-dangerous-drug-8822463.html So I am to believe the same people who were fighting to make it legal for themselves can't find any evidence in this day and age for its medical usages. I guess they lost the paper work they were trying to put together to get marijuana on the Harrison act back in 1937. It's all one big joke Amy and we are the brunt end of it. The globalists are the ones running this game and everybody has a dog in this race one way or another. Taken from a Norml page: "Medical Use Marijuana, or cannabis, as it is more appropriately called, has been part of humanity's medicine chest for almost as long as history has been recorded. Of all the negative consequences of marijuana prohibition, none is as tragic as the denial of medicinal cannabis to the tens of thousands of patients who could benefit from its therapeutic use." I like to see just how many people who smoked marijuana did it just for the medical aspect. I am sure the numbers were low back in the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, and maybe the 90's the rate was much higher for mmj. And on the topic of intoxicant. Show me reliable studies that show the dangers of using marijuana over most products sold at any stores these days. I've been driving almost 30 years and the wife and I are going on our 24 th year together and we've been hit 6 times total by straight people. Prohibition is the problem ...... Back in a few, LOL

  -1
  View full conversation on Facebook
• Referral from September 25, 2013
  

  Cassandra I. asked:

  Does anybody know where I can buy cheap colored contacts at?

  

  Ama N. replied:

  http://www.expertbriefings.com/.../ http://americannewsreport.com/... If they are poor quality and not the right size yes there are plenty of risks...

  -1
  View full conversation on Facebook