Personal Trainers in Farnborough, United Kingdom

Just a thought - if you want to know what my last book is like, then take a look here "No Worries" http://amzn.to/1 aznu3 h and I also wrote the foreword to "Hypnosis for Running" take a look here http://www.amazon.co.uk/Hypnosis-For-Running-Training-Performance/dp/0957566700

I know where you're coming from Gary Turner. Some of the answers are here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKMpTlxTSGM

Shaun, the idea of 'Simple' and 'complex' carbs were dropped even by more conventional nutritionists several years ago. They now express these things in terms of a given food's 'glycemic load' or GL. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycemic_load

Daniel Commane has a P.H.D in this sort of stuff he can let you know if ur right or wrong

Ah, I love it when I put a myth to bed. Shaun I take a bit of adivce and break it down. Find out what actually happens, starting from the base level and building up. It is amazing how many myths are based on, basically, crap lol! Jesse Mdk Saunders, there's no research to support this. Never has been. Terry Wrx Anderson, what type of fast acting or slow acting carbs are they? What type of sugars and how are the absorbed and utilised by the body, and under what circumstances, and required with what? Because being told to base your diet on fast or slow acting carbs is based on incorrect science. See Michael's post above. Yet even the GL and GI have major failings if put into practice. The same foods from different sources can have completely different GL and GI loadings. Take carrots - what type of carrot? And then cooking them adjusts the GL and GI too. How much are they cooked? All of it adjusts the loadings.

He still gets some things wrong, yet that doesn't detract from the message. Errors are: - the countries in Keys seven country study did no include Australia, Canada, England and Wales. The chart shown by Lustig is incorrect as it is from a Keys' presentation to Mount Sinai hospital and not the study referred to. - Lustig states that 150 'extra' soda calories will result in a 15.6 pound weight gain each year - they won't - Isomal comparison (baby food) has 10.3% sucrose vs 10.5% sucrose in cola however this is not comparing like with like as the cola includes water where the Isomil data does not. Not that I'm a geek or anything, but I have listened to this and cross referenced what he has said against elsewhere. Notwithstanding the small errors his message is a very, very good one.

Hopefully Mike Paul Hull will add u......